Meta-analysis · 2014

A positive association between anxiety disorders and cannabis use or cannabis use disorders in the general population--a meta-analysis of 31 studies.

Kedzior KK, Laeber LT.

Study design
Meta-analysis
Population / model
Human
Published
2014-05-10
Journal
BMC psychiatry

From the author abstract

“There was a small positive association between anxiety and either cannabis use (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.45, p = .006; N …”

A short attributed excerpt. Read the full abstract and original paper for methods, results and limitations.

Figures from the paper

Figure 1 Selection of studies and exclusion criteria.Kedzior KK, Laeber LT. BMC psychiatry (2014). Original figure · CC BY · Resized for display.
Figure 2 Random-effects meta-analysis ofN = 15 studies on anxiety vs. cannabis use/no use. Notes: The forest plot (top) shows the effect size (OR) in each study, the weight of each study (size of the box), and the 95% CI (the horizontal line through each box). The overall mean weighted OR is depicted as the centre of the diamond and its horizontal edges are the 95% CI. Since the diamond did not cross the line of no effect (OR=1), there was an overall positive association between anxiety and cannabis use in N=15 studies (overall mean weighted OR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.45). The funnel plot (bottom) shows the distribution of the individual effect sizes around the overall mean weighted OR (unfilled diamond). The trim-and-fill analysis revealed that the plot was symmetrical (the recomputed overall mean weighted OR depicted as the filled diamond overlaps with the unfilled diamond) suggesting that there was little evidence for a publication bias in the current analysis.Kedzior KK, Laeber LT. BMC psychiatry (2014). Original figure · CC BY · Resized for display.
Citation and indexing details

PMID 24884989 · PMC4032500

Publication types: Journal Article; Meta-Analysis

Topic tags: Anxiety & stress; Substance use

Metadata checked 2026-11-04. Study design and model tags follow indexing and explicit abstract terms. Citation counts are not evidence of benefit. An available full text does not by itself permit image reuse.